Is a New Study on ARBs and Cancer Risk Cause for Alarm? [GUEST POST]

by Jack Lewin July 13, 2010 08:50

This post comes to us from Jeffrey Anderson, M.D., F.A.C.C., chair-elect of the ACC/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and Vice Chair of the 2010 UA/NSTEMI Focused Update. Dr. Anderson also is the Associate Chief of Cardiology at Intermountain Medical Center in Murray, UT.

*****************************************

Angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) agents drugs have shown substantial reductions in the risk of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with hypertension and heart disease. However, a recent article in Lancet Oncology that looks at a pooled analysis of studies focused on the cardiovascular effects of ARBS, suggests these drugs may modestly increase the risk of a new cancer diagnosis. It should be noted that the absolute risk is small, the study is retrospective and exploratory, and that the question of class effect versus specific drug effect for the potential cancer risk is uncertain.

The article, while not definitive, has generated a good deal of discussion within the cardiovascular community about how best to react in terms of both further study and in discussing with patients.

As with any product used in the care of patients with cardiovascular disease, the ACC is a huge proponent of understanding both the product’s effectiveness and safety. In this particular case, the College is supportive of efforts to further clarify the association of ARBs and cancer and put the study’s potential findings into better perspective. For example, do the proven benefits of ARBs outweigh the risk of cancer? That being said, these new data should not warrant overreaction.

In the interim, patients should not stop taking ARBs based upon these data, but should work with their care providers to determine the best medication regimen. (If you're looking for a good article to give your patients on the topic, see this CardioSmart article.) The study does not diminish the importance of treating hypertension or left ventricular systolic dysfunction with effective regiments prescribed by their physicians, which may include the use of ARBs. Current UA/NSTEMI and STEMI guidelines, as well as performance measures for heart failure at AMI, remain current in that they generally support ACE inhibitors as first-line therapy where appropriate. ARBs are recommended for patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors. 

What do you think?

- Jeffrey Anderson, M.D., F.A.C.C.

Comments

Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen

About the Authors

The ACC in Touch blog is co-authored by ACC CEO Jack Lewin, MD, current ACC President David Holmes, MD, FACC, and Board of Governors Chair Thad Waites, MD, FACC.

Jack Lewin Jack Lewin, MD, has been chief executive officer of the ACC since November 2006. Under his leadership the College has continued to build upon its standing as a national leader in advocacy, with a particular focus on reforming Medicare, Medicaid, and the financing and delivery of quality health care.

David Holmes

David Holmes, MD, FACC, became ACC president in April 2011. Dr. Holmes is the Edward W. and Betty Knight Scripps Professor in Cardiovascular Medicine at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and an interventional cardiologist in the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and the Department of Internal Medicine at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.

Thad Waites

Thad Waites, MD, FACC, began as Board of Governors chair in April 2011, and currently practices clinical cardiology with emphasis on interventional cardiology at Hattiesburg Clinic in Hattiesburg, Miss. He is also a board member of the Mississippi State Board of Health, and director of the cardiac cath lab at Forrest General Hospital.

Learn more about Drs. Lewin, Holmes and Waites.



Recent Comments

Comment RSS

The ACC is Your CardioSource!

Visit CardioSource.org for the most comprehensive online cardiovascular resource, with outstanding content, streamlined access, and advanced customization.

Calendar

<<  February 2012  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728291234
567891011

View posts in large calendar