The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of E-Prescribing

by Administrator May 11, 2011 03:19

By David May, MD, PhD, FACC, senior physician and founder of Cardiovascular Specialists, PA, in Coppell, Texas, president of the Texas Chapter of the ACC and a member of the Board of Governors’ Steering Committee.

*****

Like a Sergio Leone western, e-prescribing (e-Rx) has been viewed by many as a dark and foreboding landscape in which physicians must have a broad, sweeping view of the electronic health care vista alternating with intimate, close-up reflections on each patient encounter. In reality, e-Rx accomplishes neither of these things perfectly. It is, however, here to stay.

The concept of e-Rx is quite simple.  The ability to submit an accurate, understandable, legible prescription without typographical mistakes from the point of care to the pharmacy is a vitally important part of any safe health care system.  Because of how important it is, the development and facilitation of the e-Rx process is one of the key elements in the overall plan for the further advancement of the electronic health infrastructure for the U.S.

Section 132 of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 provides the guidelines for the incentive program we now define as the e-Prescribing Incentive Program. It was implemented in 2009 as a stand-alone program in addition to the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Providers who wished to participate in the e-Rx program could but did not have to participate in the PQRS incentive program.

Two years post-implementation, where does the program stand? Let’s review the good, the bad and the ugly.

The Good
The electronic submission of a prescription from the point of care to the pharmacy reduces errors by providing accurate, dose-correct prescriptions without illegible handwriting in a timely fashion. It benefits providers and pharmacies by allowing 24-hour submission and its asynchronous communication eliminates the “phone tag” delay associated with telephone submission and the twisted, often illegible faxed-in prescription. For patients, medicines are available in a timely and expeditious fashion with accurate tracking available. In my private practice, we’ve seen fewer mistakes in prescriptions, faster turnaround time in the pharmacy, and incentive payments in 2009 and 2010 of 2% of our Medicare Part B professional reimbursement through the e-Prescribing Program.

The Bad
The implementation of e-Rx submission requires providers to alter their normal work flow and develop additional skills. In addition, the enhancing and maintaining staff training is mandatory. For example, in my practice, the nurses are responsible for making sure the prescriptions make it to the right pharmacy for the patient. We had to devote a lot of resources to training to make sure this happens for every prescription. With a little creativity though, we were able to make this a more enjoyable experience by implementing the training as a game.

In addition, e-Rx requires great attention to detail, in that if your Internet access is not reliable, electronic submission can be problematic. Due diligence is necessary to be certain that submission has “gone through” successfully, and this is a departure from handing a patient a prescription and being done with it.

The Ugly
Like the PQRS incentive program, e-Rx incentive “carrot” is rapidly changing to an incentive “stick.” The 2012 payment adjustment reporting period is Jan. 1 to June 30, 2011. Practices that have not submitted 10 e-Rx submissions per provider by June 30, 2011, will be penalized 1% of their Medicare professional fee reimbursement for 2012. In addition, registry submission of the e-Rx information is not allowed for this time frame. The e-Rx information must be submitted by claim with the appropriate G code and evaluation and management code.

The E-Prescribing Program may not be perfect, but unlike a Sergio Leone western, it’s a reality. In order to avoid a one percent (1%) decrease in the covered professional Medicare reimbursement for 2012, you must be e-prescribing before June 30 of this year. See www.cardiosource.org/HealthIT for more resources to get started.

Comments

Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen

About the Authors

The ACC in Touch blog is co-authored by current ACC President William Zoghbi, MD, FACC, and Board of Governors Chair Dipti Itchhaporia, MD, FACC.  William Zoghbi

William Zoghbi, MD, FACC, became ACC president in March 2012. Dr. Zoghbi is the William L. Winters endowed Chair of Cardiovascular Imaging at The Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center and director of the Cardiovascular Imaging Institute at the Methodist Hospital in Houston, Texas.
Dipti Itchhaporia

Dipti Itchhaporia, MD, FACC, began as the chair of the Board of Governors in March 2012. Dr. Itchhaporia holds the Robert and Georgia Roth Chair for Excellence in Cardiac Care and is the medical director of disease management for Hoag Heart and Vascular Institute.

Learn more about Drs. Zoghbi and Itchhaporia.

Recent Comments

Comment RSS


The ACC is Your CardioSource!

Visit CardioSource.org for the most comprehensive online cardiovascular resource, with outstanding content, streamlined access, and advanced customization.

Calendar

<<  May 2012  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910

View posts in large calendar

The ACC requests that readers abide by its social media policies, which are available here: http://www.cardiosource.org/News-Media/ACC-in-Touch.aspx#policy